The agenda presented by the club secretary Mr. D. Brooke
Subjects presented in order with the secretary's recorded introduction
Introduction
Recorded Introduction:
Link to alternative site for immediate play [ Don.s Intro. ASC Audio_33_02/17]
Audio_33 02/17
Present..
Thinking long and hard on what say on this contribution. It wasn't till the accompanying link shown gave a different insight into the numerous verbal illustrations afforded by the hosted radio program.
Initially was to say: From the time of Noah (of the great flood) till the Reformation within the christian world, there was the Bible; the populated christian world before and after Christ's advent comprised of r's. Paralleling during the period was the Arab nomadic communities, 1000 yrs before the reformation became a nation with their book of instruction i.e. the Koran, these people also r's. Through the Dark Age to the Middle Age - approx. 1000 years, say from 500 CE - to the time of the Reformation. So, assuming from the dialogue a Godly select, those people brandished from a disunited Europe, found refugee from persecution in Central America. From this radio program you could have been excused to take from examples afforded, those who were to receive the principles and practices of the Enlightenment. People being prepared for what was to follow within a century or too : perhaps selectively, chosen by the Divine for neofrontal cortex development. These American pioneers gave rise to K types.
After going through www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/home-page/ questions in-numerous put the kibosh on the (above) "assuming" as developed.
However, this excerpt from within the opened link, no matter whether k's are protein or r's vegetarian consumers. Apparently history led this passage contributor to concludes:-
"This concept has enormous potential to alter our political debate forever. Once someone sees the forces behind politics, there is no going back, and Leftism will never look the same. Such an informed individual is forever changed, and for them, the political debate can never find itself obscured by shades of gray. For Leftists especially, this work threatens with the possibility of out-grouping – the most potent psychological trauma a Leftist can endure. Under the tenets of this work, they espouse an inferior r-urge in a species which is undeniably, and aggressively, K."
Apart from the intelligent's shown by the two, of one mind, presenting the r/K Theory program. Both claim K type endowment. They were educated at some stage (presumed infant or child) in England, later calling the US home. HOW SMART WERE THESE EDUCATORS!
Link to alternative site for immediate play of discussion following.
712_0205 02/17
CONCLUSION with a vote of thanks for the secretary evenings events.
Thursday, April 6, 2017
Friday, January 27, 2017
10th November 2016 Immigration-Emigration America, past and now
he agenda presented by the club secretary Mr. D. Brooke
Subjects presented in order with the secretary's recorded introduction
Introduction
Recorded Introduction:
Link to alternative site for immediate play [ Don.s Intro. ASC Audio_32 11/16]
Don's Intro Audio_32 11/16
FY(listeners)I the following "waffle" and "red hearings" could be excised as sound line progresses:
23:30 to 24:45, 25:25 to 26:05, 26:30 to 27:23 (end); some consistency with established meeting conduct those times in between. The file left intact due to latter, could have been terminated at 23:30 minute. Present.
This viewing was to take us over the permissible time -- very long stream. The first fifty
minutes taken up with a history lesson, covering legal and judicial implications regarding
immigration to America from the mid 19th century to mid 20th century. A year to remember
1875 for a judicial reason, and later during the Civil Rights period of the 20th century a challenge to that decision . A case of the Supreme Court of US reversing a previous decision which impinged on (state) citizen rights as it might bear on immigrants being welcomed. A example in recent times of central government broadening its interference in state sovereignty. In Australia the issue of sovereignty intentionally confused -- excluding Her Majesty and Her delegates -- so laypersons kept ignorant betwixt state and federal legislative bounds; but no matter these legislators work in a similar liberty undermining manner; reminded oft are resident subjects their interests are uppermost a concern of government. So during that 100 years like America, Australia developed a policy called "White Australia", as in the US the people allowed into the country would be determined by policy (then) enacted by governments elected to carry the wishes of voters. The commentator before concluding the 50 mins segment tells us, the post WW1 revolution in Russia and the unrest in Germany -- leading to WW11 -- brought more people to the New Worlds (Australia incl.). He (presenter/commentator) interestingly states the situation in Germany with socialists: communists one day, brown shirts the next, it took a little bloke with a mustachio (apparently), to put a stop to the nonsense.
So a imaginary line drawn after the above, and sub-headings hereafter introduced as what
followed: quotations, explanations, some analysis and graphs when applicable.
For conciseness starting with "Communists and the Hart-Cellar Act" US government intrigue
with communists.
"Immigrant Demographics" people flee from communism, or immigrate from Asia and Americas
"Refugees and Asylees" tax payers cost to establish new-come enclaves
"Nation" Stalin on culture (ED. cf. Aristotle) multi-culture its uses and failures
"Multiculturalism" Racial diversity and distrust (F. Salter-Ethnologist), A. Merkel German
Chancellor - multi-culture failed Germany
"Violence and Diversity" Greater diversity more violence
"Property and Diversity" " " " "
"Multiculturalism" INSECURITY, consequence "... misery for all"
"Immigration Reform" 2005 US government attempt to regain secure borders
"Recent Events" 2012-2013 lax border security with Pres. Obama; US, Latino children
attracted to come North
"Immigrants Vote" Non-industrial countries produce leftist/communists Democrat vote captures
"Immigrants and Taxes" Homelands taxed and welfare advantaged, immigrants provide less tax
"Immigrants and Jobs" Wage and opportunity (relevance education), disparity 1st decade 20th
century 3.7%, 08/2012 8.1%
"Immigrants and Real GDP per Capita" graph shows from 1830 to 1920 linear growth both
"Education" less qualified to homeland educated
"Remittances" approx. 10% remitted abroad - $ Billions
"Agribusiness and Republicans" Employer market advantage, subsisidised, US dumps excess
produce on Mexico
"Immigration and War on Drugs" See immediately above ... linked consequence
"Importing Criminals" a question, Ans. seems agents ah, ah, kept very busy
"Border patrols" Budget $3.5 billion, mmh, think 21,000 employed(?)
"Border Deaths" fluctuate as graphed: subject class(?) or unfortunates involved one way or
another, agents, trespassers and i assume a scattering of low order criminals
The summary conclusion by a self-confessed free marketeer. All welcomed, find a economic
footing, regardless it must be better than from whence you came to the homeland and should
you stay. Where numbers count don't challenge home-landers with existing residency ... with
intention at some later date you might, by virtue of numbers or by other intended means
interfere with the status quo. and especially, the free market concept on which the country
was established.
Link to alternative site for immediate play of discussion following.
712_0203 11/16
CONCLUSION with a vote of thanks for the secretary evenings events.
Subjects presented in order with the secretary's recorded introduction
Introduction
Recorded Introduction:
Link to alternative site for immediate play [ Don.s Intro. ASC Audio_32 11/16]
Don's Intro Audio_32 11/16
FY(listeners)I the following "waffle" and "red hearings" could be excised as sound line progresses:
23:30 to 24:45, 25:25 to 26:05, 26:30 to 27:23 (end); some consistency with established meeting conduct those times in between. The file left intact due to latter, could have been terminated at 23:30 minute. Present.
This viewing was to take us over the permissible time -- very long stream. The first fifty
minutes taken up with a history lesson, covering legal and judicial implications regarding
immigration to America from the mid 19th century to mid 20th century. A year to remember
1875 for a judicial reason, and later during the Civil Rights period of the 20th century a challenge to that decision . A case of the Supreme Court of US reversing a previous decision which impinged on (state) citizen rights as it might bear on immigrants being welcomed. A example in recent times of central government broadening its interference in state sovereignty. In Australia the issue of sovereignty intentionally confused -- excluding Her Majesty and Her delegates -- so laypersons kept ignorant betwixt state and federal legislative bounds; but no matter these legislators work in a similar liberty undermining manner; reminded oft are resident subjects their interests are uppermost a concern of government. So during that 100 years like America, Australia developed a policy called "White Australia", as in the US the people allowed into the country would be determined by policy (then) enacted by governments elected to carry the wishes of voters. The commentator before concluding the 50 mins segment tells us, the post WW1 revolution in Russia and the unrest in Germany -- leading to WW11 -- brought more people to the New Worlds (Australia incl.). He (presenter/commentator) interestingly states the situation in Germany with socialists: communists one day, brown shirts the next, it took a little bloke with a mustachio (apparently), to put a stop to the nonsense.
So a imaginary line drawn after the above, and sub-headings hereafter introduced as what
followed: quotations, explanations, some analysis and graphs when applicable.
For conciseness starting with "Communists and the Hart-Cellar Act" US government intrigue
with communists.
"Immigrant Demographics" people flee from communism, or immigrate from Asia and Americas
"Refugees and Asylees" tax payers cost to establish new-come enclaves
"Nation" Stalin on culture (ED. cf. Aristotle) multi-culture its uses and failures
"Multiculturalism" Racial diversity and distrust (F. Salter-Ethnologist), A. Merkel German
Chancellor - multi-culture failed Germany
"Violence and Diversity" Greater diversity more violence
"Property and Diversity" " " " "
"Multiculturalism" INSECURITY, consequence "... misery for all"
"Immigration Reform" 2005 US government attempt to regain secure borders
"Recent Events" 2012-2013 lax border security with Pres. Obama; US, Latino children
attracted to come North
"Immigrants Vote" Non-industrial countries produce leftist/communists Democrat vote captures
"Immigrants and Taxes" Homelands taxed and welfare advantaged, immigrants provide less tax
"Immigrants and Jobs" Wage and opportunity (relevance education), disparity 1st decade 20th
century 3.7%, 08/2012 8.1%
"Immigrants and Real GDP per Capita" graph shows from 1830 to 1920 linear growth both
"Education" less qualified to homeland educated
"Remittances" approx. 10% remitted abroad - $ Billions
"Agribusiness and Republicans" Employer market advantage, subsisidised, US dumps excess
produce on Mexico
"Immigration and War on Drugs" See immediately above ... linked consequence
"Importing Criminals" a question, Ans. seems agents ah, ah, kept very busy
"Border patrols" Budget $3.5 billion, mmh, think 21,000 employed(?)
"Border Deaths" fluctuate as graphed: subject class(?) or unfortunates involved one way or
another, agents, trespassers and i assume a scattering of low order criminals
The summary conclusion by a self-confessed free marketeer. All welcomed, find a economic
footing, regardless it must be better than from whence you came to the homeland and should
you stay. Where numbers count don't challenge home-landers with existing residency ... with
intention at some later date you might, by virtue of numbers or by other intended means
interfere with the status quo. and especially, the free market concept on which the country
was established.
Link to alternative site for immediate play of discussion following.
712_0203 11/16
CONCLUSION with a vote of thanks for the secretary evenings events.
13th October 2016 Great (eco.) Depression US; Debt (a repeat)
The agenda presented by the club secretary Mr. D. Brooke
Subjects presented in order with the secretary's recorded introduction
Introduction
Recorded Introduction:
Link to alternative site for immediate play [ Don's Intro. ASC Audio_30 10/16]
Audio_30 10/16
Present 1.
A long -- over a hour-- doco. intentionally to disparage the New Deal: a number of economic
implementations started by FDR in 1932 up till the start of WWII. Very much slanted by the
presenter and producer of this narration -- a essay by a economic professor. Now this
professor and the producer-presenter have one thing in common, both a advocates of Free
Market Capitalism. There was nothing in the way of setting a social background prior to
and after WWI that lead to the catastrophe called the Great Depression that began 1928/29.
Other than the US president during the 1920's till 1932 was a Republican and a free
marketer. So members were not told whether immigration after WWI or religious obedience to
a then current encyclical with other people of non-conformist attitudes propagating their kind as
well, indifferent to what consequence could result. Members' understand what happened, maybe as a consequence of this period, large families numerous before WWII though dwindling in siblings, being replaced per capita with lesser numbers than previous. So with omissions this well
produced -- great background footage -- dictation was nothing but didactic. We (members)
were to understand it was free market economics that caused a recession, that both
presidents H. Hoover and FDR took the US and the rest of the World to a greater, or less
intensity, into Depression. Members waited to about the 59th minute to be told by the
speaker, investment money was returning, pulling the country by virtue of free market
activity out of a list (incl. in sub-title) from further despoliation. No mention made of
lack of accommodation during the period apparently not significant; but noted the marvelous
production of vehicles, over 5 million in 1929, dwindled in subsequent years, truly
stupendous in a time of labour intensive manufacture. Initial over production and a
market's inability to sustain output. As recalling my history schooling this can be a
consequent of Capitalism ... but now 50 years circa. later, government intervention and
regulation makes things worse according to presentation assessment of history.
For me and members it was difficult to find fault with the New Deal initiatives, perhaps
poorly implemented (may be not) meaning the slowness to adjust had other cause(s)?!?! Even
a kind of postscript didn't resolve issues arising. As this doco. was produced since 2008
GFC and comparisons drawn with the earlier debacle: same FRB. and government action
comprehended current, as to that taken earlier. The difference, terminology used as
scripted (doco.), elsewhere QE making a number of well positioned recipients more wealthy.
As members, club secretary and recorded (hereby typing) understand, the American economy is
after 8 years back on its "feet", QE has been a great initiative and as a generalisation the
GFC was no way as damaging to the American people as the Great Depression et al.
Link to alternative site for immediate play of discussion following.
712_0200 10/16
Present 2.
Now this offering by Don has come up at least twice before and recorded. Yes the content very recent and concerning to all responsible people whether American or Australian people. Then again my recording of the presentation unsatisfactory to members, only they can set me straight; inviting their input.
Link to alternative site for immediate play of discussion following.
712_0201 10/16
CONCLUSION with a vote of thanks for the secretary evenings events.
Subjects presented in order with the secretary's recorded introduction
Introduction
Recorded Introduction:
Link to alternative site for immediate play [ Don's Intro. ASC Audio_30 10/16]
Audio_30 10/16
Present 1.
A long -- over a hour-- doco. intentionally to disparage the New Deal: a number of economic
implementations started by FDR in 1932 up till the start of WWII. Very much slanted by the
presenter and producer of this narration -- a essay by a economic professor. Now this
professor and the producer-presenter have one thing in common, both a advocates of Free
Market Capitalism. There was nothing in the way of setting a social background prior to
and after WWI that lead to the catastrophe called the Great Depression that began 1928/29.
Other than the US president during the 1920's till 1932 was a Republican and a free
marketer. So members were not told whether immigration after WWI or religious obedience to
a then current encyclical with other people of non-conformist attitudes propagating their kind as
well, indifferent to what consequence could result. Members' understand what happened, maybe as a consequence of this period, large families numerous before WWII though dwindling in siblings, being replaced per capita with lesser numbers than previous. So with omissions this well
produced -- great background footage -- dictation was nothing but didactic. We (members)
were to understand it was free market economics that caused a recession, that both
presidents H. Hoover and FDR took the US and the rest of the World to a greater, or less
intensity, into Depression. Members waited to about the 59th minute to be told by the
speaker, investment money was returning, pulling the country by virtue of free market
activity out of a list (incl. in sub-title) from further despoliation. No mention made of
lack of accommodation during the period apparently not significant; but noted the marvelous
production of vehicles, over 5 million in 1929, dwindled in subsequent years, truly
stupendous in a time of labour intensive manufacture. Initial over production and a
market's inability to sustain output. As recalling my history schooling this can be a
consequent of Capitalism ... but now 50 years circa. later, government intervention and
regulation makes things worse according to presentation assessment of history.
For me and members it was difficult to find fault with the New Deal initiatives, perhaps
poorly implemented (may be not) meaning the slowness to adjust had other cause(s)?!?! Even
a kind of postscript didn't resolve issues arising. As this doco. was produced since 2008
GFC and comparisons drawn with the earlier debacle: same FRB. and government action
comprehended current, as to that taken earlier. The difference, terminology used as
scripted (doco.), elsewhere QE making a number of well positioned recipients more wealthy.
As members, club secretary and recorded (hereby typing) understand, the American economy is
after 8 years back on its "feet", QE has been a great initiative and as a generalisation the
GFC was no way as damaging to the American people as the Great Depression et al.
Link to alternative site for immediate play of discussion following.
712_0200 10/16
Present 2.
Now this offering by Don has come up at least twice before and recorded. Yes the content very recent and concerning to all responsible people whether American or Australian people. Then again my recording of the presentation unsatisfactory to members, only they can set me straight; inviting their input.
Link to alternative site for immediate play of discussion following.
712_0201 10/16
CONCLUSION with a vote of thanks for the secretary evenings events.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)