The agenda presented by the club secretary Mr. D. Brooke
Subjects presented in order with the secretary's recorded introduction
Introduction
Recorded Introduction:
Link to alternative site for immediate play [ Don.s Intro. ASC Audio_26 06//16]
Audio_26 06/16
Present 1.
This present has to be regarded as the Don's head offering for the night. It causes me to
remember some repeated utterances from my long departed parents, these to be covered later.
My generation have a lot in common with that of Marx and his contemporary F. Engels, these
two lived in a Europe much dominated by secular Catholicism. They the post Napoleon
generation; we the children of post WW11 and subject to a dominant Catholic political-
social cohesion -- unlike in the Mother Land. After the Napoleonic Wars Industrial
expansion was taking effect everywhere, possibly lagging in Australia. Now many countries
including Australia without secondary industry seemed sustained by the second revolution
the Digital age. What comes of this is a questioning of the Marx-Engels Manifesto. Was
their intention to develop a ideology in step with temporal Catholicism or as a counter.
Because in Australia the power within this State's (N.S.W.) structure was and probably
still is a amalgam of socialist and Catholic (proactive) domination as ascertained. This claim self-evident, as a subject(?) -- there's a confusion about this as well -- one who has over intervening years whilst resident been subject to abnormality, not whilst with parents abroad. So this Satan debasing culture (I didn't volunteer) to be a victim, if this is what it seems (to a reader), don't you be targeted by whatever "...ism" -- with wars and revolutions seeming to serve a legacy going back to a time after the early church.
With the lead subject of the evening the personal life of K. Marx the originator who's name
is given to the doctrine. Why expect other than turpitude from someone who caused the loss
of many lives over many years. Don in summoning up a long discourse on the life and times
of K. Marx said " ........ he was not a good man" (ref. file Audio_26), this a under-
statement as club members can testify after listening to the offering.
My mother (from earlier above) would would say about this person or that person, depending
on her assessment as a "natural person"; perhaps in the case of Marx a man who gave
himself over to conduct of all kinds of passion(?) My father would "bang on" about "the
great socialist", did he mean that Karl (Marx) was the promoter of a deceptive doctrine
promoting, I have to assume a culture that the Church of Rome in former time promulgated.
Or his, i.e. Marx's implication in the distress (unto death) of many ... by his authorship(?)
More could be said on the matter of my father and his opinion of intellectuals. Father
would say civilization has advanced due to a very small number of people, at any one time
maybe two to three percent of the population, nothing contributed by the proletariat(?)
[Ed. From the foregoing father was quite conservative and would have placed a bailet to
this effect].
The presenter's discourse follows along a line of different reasoning, Marx a Jew was a
hypocrite, immoral man and reprehensible for what he advocated in his writings. A person
showing himself not to be a exemplar of values his writings advocated. A lapsed Christian
of Jewish ancestry, a scholar devoid of seeing the mayhem he was to sew into history's ...
or, he just didn't care as a man given over to a obsession?!?! Also criticised for
improvident handling of money. Recalling that in N.S.W. divorce laws where until the time
of the Whitlam government of the 1970's was based on the concept of entitlement: a divorced
wife entitled to be maintained at a standard she had prior to the alleged misdemeanor of
either party, with particular reference to the husband, subject to law court resolution.
So apparently in Jewish thinking is "entitlement" -- Jewish influence not to be
underestimated in law and politics since WW11 with refugee immigration. So is it not natural
K. Marx's claim on a standard of survival in keeping with his expectation, though be it
banked rolled by others?!?!
[Ed. To add to Don's summary, the presenter (referred to as in "discourse" earlier)
couldn't have done a better job of assassination if using a scatter gun -- nothing missed.
Reminiscent of another "...ism" surviving, seems to co-op acolytes to operates on its behalf.]
Link to alternative site for immediate play of discussion following.
712_0183 06/16
Present 2.
General Motors (America) the diversion of tax payers money -- after the GFC -- bailout
money used by the company to establish its operation largely in China. China so the story
went, propositioned GM ten years before the economic melt-down and subsequent corrections
to "diversify" and the CCP indirectly scored $1,000,000,000 -- or was it $1,000,000,000,000
-- dollars US, apparently a good business deal the consequence of free trade, President
Obama "crowning" achievement. Where did this leave America: deals cut to keep American GM
employees in jobs; AND China funding strategic enterprises on American soil to supply
munitions to Muslims wagging hostilities in the Middle-East. [Ed. Seems this streamed
video production made before the South China sea, its islands became a heated topic of
international concern].
Link to alternative site for immediate play of discussion following.
712_0184 06/16
Present 3.
Thinking not our members would disagree with this 15 minute revelation, researched and
incisively presented on the motive for the seizure and public humiliation of Julian Assange.
The master race (international controllers) who have been embarrassed by the Wikileak's
founder, for exposures, revealed in classified documents, those revelations so far seem to
have minor or no repercussions. Yet a example as a warning for us lesser mortals --
especially in positions to do our masters damage -- what our powerful overlords can do to
us by "long drawing and quartering" Mr. Assange. A suggestion from the presenter for more
to be revealed, something to break into headline in the future, possibly next year. The
presenter's analysis exemplary. [Ed. What remains outstanding in relation to Mr Assange is
his senate candidature in the Australian Federal election 2013 failed. Do we assume if he
became a senator this unpleasantness with his voluntary with drawl from society
unnecessary? Shame on the Victorian electors if that be the case.]
From what we've been told and what may still remains unsaid, if it wasn't for Julian's
morality, members (and I) would think a couple of manipulative public(sic) Personal Service escorts, doubling as business women, were seeking attention to market porn. A "black-widow" styled attempt, Julian their victim; the Yanks to resuscitate then finish the bloke off.
Link to alternative site for immediate play of discussion following.
712_0185 06/16
Present 4.
The title Human Rights putting countries where Islam prevails and Islamic Law. Club
members shown aggressive examples both by religious authority and parents of delinquent women
being brought to obedience. Custom and parental authority where honour is due (to family
maintaining a good reputation) has in rare circumstance lead to a death of a loved-one. As
a people of Christian heritage -- Catholic though we (may) be -- we have shown intolerance
to sects and cults outside the "faith" so called by adherents; persecution and death to the
heretics ... So killing of priests, burning of churches and the blowing up of icons not so
un-natural if you know popular history -- disregard source and accuracy when convenient.
What's should be more concerning is a horrific bill to be brought to parliament, detaining
classified prisoners after court judgement and statutory procedures. It's taken --
stating on behalf of the club -- this intention is a misuse of habeas corpus without
clear evidence of intention, thereafter commitment through to implementation. Laws
regarding "conspiracy" to do this, that or something else are frightening. Don't
legislators understand when a "line" so called crossed, many subjects think -- many more
should also contemplate -- consider well consequences, both positive, and not the negative
as this reversal of established principle would challenge. These people (politicians)
with their abhorrent plans to abet more than one purpose -- Human Rights huh! We (members)
are reminded when opportunity presents, what they (government) do is done (as a ploy
meaning "prank") for "The Safety of the Australian People?!?!
Link to alternative site for immediate play of discussion following.
712_0186 06/16
CONCLUSION with a vote of thanks for the secretary evenings events.
